This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

COLOMBIA

The strange suspension attempt against President Gustavo Petro

Gustavo Petro casting his ballot during the presidential first-round vote, in May. Photo: Andrea Puentes/Colombian presidency

Even in a continent that has seen its fair share of presidential instability, the news that Colombian President Gustavo Petro has been suspended from office was sure to shock any reader. But, as it turned out, the headline contained a lot more show than substance.

Just 11 days before a runoff between government candidate Iván Cepeda and right-wing favorite Abelardo de la Espriella, the head of the House Committee on Investigation and Impeachment said it would suspend President Petro from his position until June 21 for violating norms against participating in electoral campaigns while in office…

🔒 This was a free preview; the rest is behind our paywall

Don’t miss out! Upgrade to unlock full access. The process takes only seconds with Apple Pay or Stripe. Become a member.

Why you should subscribe

We’re here for readers who want to truly understand Brazil and Latin America — a region too often ignored or misrepresented by the international media.

Since 2017, our reporting has been powered by paid subscribers. They’re the reason we can keep a full-time team of journalists across Brazil and Argentina, delivering sharp, independent coverage every day.

If you value our work, subscribing is the best way to keep it going — and growing.

You already back us. Here's why we're asking for more

You're already a subscriber — which means you've made a choice. You decided that understanding Brazil, accurately and ahead of the headlines, was worth paying for. Thank you. That choice is the reason we exist.

Every contribution above your subscription goes directly into journalism: the reporters and editors on the ground in São Paulo, Brasília, and Rio who file what parachute correspondents and recycled-wire intelligence simply can't. It's the difference between covering 2026 and covering it the way it deserves to be covered.

If The Brazilian Report has earned a place in how you read the country, consider giving beyond what you already pay. Whatever the amount, it funds the work — and it keeps it independent.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate